2. Construction
Industry
·
Latham report – movement for
innovation
·
Client centred practice
·
Partnering
Latham report:
Why:
Commisioned by the government in 1994 to
investigate the perceived problems with the construction industry. The Latham report “Constructing the
team” described the current situation as being ineffective, adversarial,
fragmented and incapable of delivering for its customers.
Latham proposed that
the client should be at the core of the construction process and that the industry
should move away from its adversarial structure, adopting a more integrated
approach with greater partnering and teamwork.
There were a great
number of detailed recommendations within the report, some of which are set out
below:
· Risk allocation to be decided as appropriate to ach
project but then allocated to the party best able to manage, estimate and carry
it.
· While taking all possible steps to avoid
conflict, providing for speedy dispute
resolution by a pre-determined impartial adjudicator
· A specific duty to deal fairly with each other,
and their supply chain in an
atmosphere of mutual co-operation
· Interrelated documents clearly defining roles and duties of all involved, suitable for all
types of projects and any procurement route
· Firm duty of teamwork, with shared financial
motivation to pursue those mutual objectives.
Improve
performance by 30% by using partnering
· 30% reduction in cost and improvement in
quality with payment security for the supply chain
· working groups producing reports on key areas
and recommendations.
·
.
The Latham report led to the creation
of the Construction Industry Board (CIB) in 1995 to
oversee implementation of its recommendations.
A number of other organizations
were established following the Latham report which united to
become Constructing Excellence in 2003.
Some of the
recommendations of the Latham Report were implemented by
the Housing Grants Construction and
Regeneration Act (the Construction Act) which amongst
other things, set out fair payment practices and regulated ‘set off’. In addition, the Scheme for Construction
Contracts, which applies when construction contracts do not comply with the Housing Grants,
Construction and Regeneration Act established the right to adjudication.
More recently, there have been significant moves in government procurement to encourage collaborative working and foster partnering, and the government
has abandoned GC Works contracts in favour of NEC3.
· Partnering term used to
describe a collaborative management approach that encourages openness and trust
between parties to a contract. Within Construction there is a interconnected
hierarchy of supply contractors necessary to work together to procure and build
a project. By promoting supply
chain partnering, each party becomes dependent on one another for success and
this requires a change in culture, attitude and procedures throughout the supply chain. It is most
commonly used on large, long-term or high-risk contracts.
· The longer the
contract, the greater the benefit of partnering as there is more
opportunity for building working relationships, finding improvements and
planning investment.
· Partnering requires expertise
and commitment from the client to set up and
manage the process effectively and to act as an adjudicator of disputes. It can be arranged
either by use of a traditional contract with a separate partnering agreement, or by use of a
contract with an aligned partnering agreement. It can be either a
two-party or multi-party arrangement.
· An example of a
partnering agreement is the NEC partnering agreement or the PPC2000
Constructing Excellence
Constructing Excellence (CE) was one of a
number of cross-industry bodies established to drive change in response to the Latham Report (Constructing the Team 1994) and the Egan Report (Rethinking Construction 1998) which
concluded that ‘the industry as a whole is under-achieving’, and called for
dramatic improvements.
Constructing
Excellence is a not-for-profit organisation governed by a Board of Management
made up of representatives from across the industry. It has 9 Regional offices
across England and Wales. Client and supplier organisations can
become members of Constructing Excellence for a fee.
It’s activities
include:
·
Lobbying to try to influence change.
·
Publishing construction industry Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) each year using
performance data collected by the Department for Business, Innovation and
Skills.
·
Benchmarking and demonstration
projects.
·
The Construction Clients' Group, promoting
best practice and industry improvements.
·
G4C
·
Constructing Excellence in Learning
Ltd (CELL), accrediting qualifications.
Since Latham and Egan, there have been significant moves in government procurement to encourage collaborative working and foster partnering, and it is
generally considered that construction has become more efficient and safer.
Key performance Indicators
Key performance
indicators in
construction can be used to:
· Monitor costs.
· Track progress.
· Assess client satisfaction.
· Identify strengths & weaknesses.
· Compare performance across and between
projects.
· Assess specific areas of a project such as sustainability, safety, waste management etc.
It is important that
key performance indicators are identified in tender documentation and that the regular provision of the
information required to assess key performance indicators is a requirement of the contract. This may
require the provision of sub-contractor information where performance on specific packages is to be monitored.
Key performance indicators may be of particular importance where the
contract stipulates that the contractor will be rewarded or penalized based on their performance relative to
certain indicators.
Examples of key performance indicators that can be used on construction projects
include:
· Cost vs budget.
· Project progress relative to milestones.
· Number of complaints.
· Number of incidents / accidents.
· The number of working hours spent on different
aspects of the works.
· The use of materials (for example the amount of
concrete poured).
· The number of defects.
· The amount of waste generated and the amount of
recycling.
· The number of variations.
Benchmarking:
Benchmarking is a
process by which the you can compare different aspects of your practice against
a collective average. It can be
used as a tool to enhance, develop and plan in the financial and practice
management of a firm. Analysis
could focus on financial performance, day-to-day management, business
development and human resources.
The RIBA runs a business benchmarking service available to all RIBA
chartered practices, which can be used to highlight areas of design that are
not offering good value for money and can help in the
assessment of tenders from suppliers and contractors.
· Benchmarking can
enable you to be more informed to position your practice within the market with
regards to fee setting.
· Can help to identify
gaps in the market within which your can try to position your practice to
creates a specialty or niche
Teamwork
· Firm duty of teamwork, with shared financial
motivation to pursue those mutual objectives.
Improve
performance by 30% by using partnering
No comments:
Post a Comment