Index:
·
Sources
of Law
·
Tort
Law
·
Contract
Law
·
Privity
of Contract
·
Limitation
Periods
·
Easements
·
Restrictive
Covenants
·
Boundaries
·
Private
Nuisance
·
Trespass
·
Air
Rights
·
Accessibility
Legislation
·
Content
of a Contract
·
Reasonable
Skill and Care vs Fit of Purpose
·
Copyright
·
Professional
Negligence
·
Professional
Indemnity Insurance
·
Collateral
Warranties + 3rd Party Rights
·
Net
Contribution Clause
·
Section
106 Agreements
·
Building
Regs and Control
·
Novation
·
Letter
of Intent
·
Building
Notice
·
Full
Plans submission
·
Bespoke
Agreements
·
The
legal Characteristics of a Contract
Glossary
Sources of Law
Three main
sources of law in the UK:
·
Common Law - UK law is based on a “common law”
legal system where the rules that make up it have been
developed by judges through “precedent” decisions of courts in past individual
cases.
·
Legislation – In its primary form this Is a
statutory law which has been written by a governing body and has become legally
enforced through the agreement of Parliament (known as an Act of
Parliament). Ie. Building Act, Health
and Safety act
·
Secondary legislation is law made by
bodies other than Parliament ie. Local authorities, but with the authority of
Parliament and often made as a result of primary legislation. ie. Building
Regulations, CDM Regulations
·
EU Law – As a condition of being part of the
European Union, EU law is binding and takes precedence to domestic UK Law.
It is made up of Regulations and Directives that are typically
integrated into UK through Acts of Parliament. (Relevant to architects:
employment, health and safety)
Tort Law
·
Is
a collection of civil law remedies entitling a person to recover damages for
loss and injury which have been caused by the actions omissions or statements
of another person in such circumstances that the latter was in breach of a duty
or obligation imposed at law.
·
In
architecture, Under Tort Law – Imposed by law due to existence of duty of care.
·
Negligence
·
Nuisance
·
Tresspass
Contract Law
·
A
promise or set of promised that the law will enforce.
·
Self
imposed obligations imposed by terms and conditions of a contract
·
Breach
of contract
Privity of contract
·
A
contract is an agreement recognised by law as binding on the parties to whom it
is between only. Privity refers to a
mutually exclusive relationship to the same enforceable rights (under
contract). This means that the terms of
the contract can not generally be enforced by or against someone who is not
party to it. There are two ways in which
a the burndens (or benefits) of a contract can be past onto a third party.
·
However, the Contracts (Rights of Third
Parties) Act, 1999 enables third party rights to
be created specifically within a contract
and the signing of a collateral warranty enables third parties to overcome the
restriction of the privity of contract, extending benefits to a third party. These are used partially when third party
funders and end users of construction projects are not privy to the main
contract between employer and contractor.
·
EXAMPLE:
The privity of contract will apply to the cancer treatment center in the
appointment of the architect and client.
As the architect has been appointed as the lead consultant the client
and architect are bound by the privity of contact within this appointment
agreement. Any appointment of specialist
sub contractors will be undertaken within a contract between the Architect and
Sub contract therefore the sub contract is not linked to the client via the any
privity of contract. Third party rights
or a collateral warranty my be negotiated with the sub contractor at the
clients request to contractually link the two parties.
Limitation Periods
·
A
limitation period is a time period after which liability is extinguished and
court action cannot be taken.
·
In
a negligence claim, time will usually run for 6 years from the date when the
negligent act or omission caused damage to occur
·
In
a claim based on a contract executed under hand, the limitation period is 6
years, running from the date when the contract was breached. The period is extended to 12 years if the
contract was executed as a deed and the limitation period runs from the date
when the contract breach happened.
·
The
Limitation Act 1980 makes It is possible to bring a claim outside the 6-year
limitation period for latent damage (damage which was not reasonably discovered
before the expiry of the basic 6-year limitation period). In these circumstances the limitation period
is 3 years from the date on which the claimant had knowledge of the damage to a
maximum of 15 years.
·
Example: Limitation periods are
relevant to the Cancer Treatment job as they will be a condition of the
Architects appointment. The architect
must ensure they have appropriate PII insurance to protect the firm against any
potential claims of negligence or breaches in contract for the full liability
period. If, for example, if 3 years
after practical completion cracking and subsidence is discovered in a corner of
the building. After further
investigation it is discovered that the design of the foundations were
insufficient, the architect could still be sued for the fault of the design as
a negligent act as it is within the 6 year liability period.
Easements
Land Laws concerns the right of a
landowner and the rights others may have over that land
·
An
easement is a right which a person has over land owned by someone else.
Easements are normally attached to the land rather than to a person and can be
considered to last in perpetuity.
Examples
of easements include:
·
Rights
of way.
·
Right
to light.
·
The
right for underground services to pass beneath the land of a neighbouring
property.
·
Right
of support.
·
The
right to draw water.
An
easement can be created by:
·
Express
grant, for example it may be set out in a conveyance deed or a transfer deed.
·
Necessity,
for example if there is only one means of access between a site and a public
highway.
·
By
prescription, i.e. the act is repeated for a period of at least twenty years.
·
Easements
can be extinguished in several ways:
·
Agreement
between the parties in the form of a deed.
·
By
implied release, for example it has not been used for a long period of time.
·
Where
the character of the dominant land has changed.
·
By
limitation of time, if a limitation was agreed.
·
By
a change in law.
Restrictive Covenants
·
A
restrictive covenant, is a restriction imposed by a seller of a piece of land
that prevents the buyer from using it in a way that could cause harm to land
the seller has retained.
·
For
a restrictive covenant to be enforceable the land benefiting from the
restriction must be identified, and the benefit must have passed to the person
trying to enforce it.
·
Covenants
– a promise contained in a deed
Restrictive
covenants might:
·
Prevent
the buy from building an extension
·
Prevent
buildings or structures being erected on the land.
·
Prevent
use of the land for business activity.
·
Prevent
residential development on the land.
·
Restrictive
covenants may have an expiry date, and may in practice turn out to be
unenforceable.
·
Example: The seller may have sub
divided a property, selling one piece with a restrictive covenants preventing
the buyer from building a dwelling of more than 10 metres, guaranteeing the
reservation of views for the seller.
Boundaries
·
An
imaginary line that marks the confines of two contiguous parcels of land
Private Nuisance
·
Unlawful
interference with a persons use of enjoyment of land or come right over, or in
connection with it.
·
The
definition of unlawful could be interpreted as “unreasonable” and may depend on
the character of the neighbourhood and the duration and frequency of the
interference
Examples:
·
Branches
overhanging onto your neighbours land
·
Noxious
fumes from a factory kills flowers in your garden.
Trespass
·
Trespass
to land is the intentional, direct interference with land in the possession of
the claimant
Air Rights
·
Subject
to planning permission, land owners have the right to develop the clear space
directly above their property.
·
These
rights can be leased or sold, enabling the construction of “air-rights
buildings”
·
Typically,
air-rights buildings are constructed above existing infrastructure such as
roads or railways, or over buildings such as low-rise shopping centres that may
have been developed when space was at less of a premium
Accessibility
Legislation
·
Primary
Legislation = The Equality Act requires "reasonable adjustments" to
be made when providing access to goods, facilities, services and premises. The
duty to make reasonable adjustments is set out in paragraph 2 of both Schedule
2 (in relation to public authorities and service providers); Schedule 8 (in
relation to employers) and Schedule 15 (in relation to associations).
·
Secondary
Legislation = Building Regulations requiring the accessible design of buildings
is regulated by the Building Regulations Part M: Access to and use of
buildings.
·
Design
and Access Statement required for planning
·
Engagement
of an Access Consultant.
Content of a Contract
·
The
rights and obligations of parties to a contract are defined by its terms.
·
Express
terms are those that have been explicitly agreed by both parties and can be
oral or in writing.
·
However,
the express terms do not always constitute all the relevant terms of the
agreement. In certain circumstances, Implied terms exist and can be upheld by
the courts if the implied terms are necessary to give business efficacy to the
agreement.
·
Ie.
Implied term implied by previous course of dealings between the parties.
·
Implied
by statue ie. Goods and services Act, if not agreed, it will be implied that
s.13 services will be provided with reasonable skill and care /reasonable time
/ reasonable price paid.
Reasonable skill and care and fitness for purpose
·
Architecture
is a profession, and the legal duty of any professional architect in carrying
out their work is to exercise the reasonable skill and care that would be
expected of the ordinary skilled architect.
If an architect can show that a responsible body of their profession
would have done the same thing, they will not ordinarily be said to have acted
negligently under the law of Torts.
Architects should never accept a term in an appointment contract
requiring the delivery of a project that is "fit for purpose”. This is because an architect may be in breach
of a fitness for purpose obligations even if they have exercised reasonable
skill and care in carrying out their services.
·
EXAMPLE: This may be relevant to the
cancer center appointment if the client request in the architects appointment
any more arduous conditions that exercising reasonable skill and care in the
deliver of their obligations under contract.
The architect should ensure that a contract with this condition is never
signed as many PII policies will not cover an obligations to ensure that the
services provided are fit for the purpose that the client requires.
·
In contrast to this, it could be
forseen that the appointed Contractor for the cancer center may sign up to
expressed terms within the construction contract requiring them to deliver a
building which is fit for purpose.
Copyright
·
Copyright
is rights to protect intellectual property, and can be used to prevent another
person copying an original work. It applies to ‘work’ not to ideas. The right
is given by the Copyright Designs and
Patents Act 1988
·
In
the case of an architectural design, the copyright will reside with the
architect who created it. However, where an architect is an employee, is is
often a condition of the employment agreement that firm will have the right to
any work that is produced while under employment
·
Copyright
will remain with the creator not with the client, unless the appointment
agreement states otherwise. RIBA Standard Form of Agreement gives the client a
license to use the design for the purposes it was intended provided that it
relates to the site, and provided that any fees due have been paid.
Professional
Negligence
Under Contract Law – Self imposed by
contract
·
An
architect can be sued for professional negligence under contract law – ie
breach the contract if an architect does not preform their role under the
contract using reasonable skill and care of a like professional. The liability period for professional
negligence claims is 6 years from the breach of contract for standard contracts
and 12 years if the contract was executed as a deed.
Under Tort Law – Imposed by law due to
existence of duty of care
·
As
a professional, an Architect has a duty
of care not to harm other parties by to exercising reasonable skill, care,
and diligence in accordance with the normal standards of the Architects
profession in the performance of their design work. If an Architect fails perform in this way,
they will also have acted negligently.
The liability period for claims made for professional negligence under
Tort law is 6 years from the time the negligence act happened.
·
A
architect also has a duty to inform
the client of progress in the performance of the services and of any issue that
may materially affect the Brief, the Construction Cost, the Timetable, or the
quality of the project.
·
As
part of the RIBA (guidance note 5) and ARB Code of Conduct (standard 8), all
Architects entering into services agreements must maintain an appropriate level
of PI insurance to protect against the risk of professional negligence. The level of PI insurance must match or be
greater than the level of liability the Architect agrees to in the appointment.
·
In
the RIBA standard Conditions 2010 standard Clause 7.4 addressed the need for PI
insurance.
·
EXAMPLE: Professional Negligence
should be a important consideration relevant to the cancer treatment
appointment. PII cover is a requirements
of the ARB Architects code, the RIBA professional code of conduct and RIBA
Chartered Eligibility criteria. It is extremely important in the appointment
contract that the level of indemnity matches the level of Professional
Indemnity Insurance taken out. If this
project is larger or more technically changeling than previous commissions
undertaken by the firm, it is important that the firm notifies their insurance
company of the new job to ensure that the firm is protected for any possible
breaches in contract or claims associated with professional negligence.
Professional
Indemnity Insurance
·
PII
is the vital final element that will provide protection for the architect when
all the other risk management procedures have failed to prevent a claim
arising. PII indemnifies the architect,
protecting them in relation to the financial consequences of claims by
others. PII cover is a requirement of
the ARB Architects code, the RIBA professional code of conduct and RIBA
Chartered Eligibility criteria. It is extremely important in the appointment
contract that the level of indemnity matches the level of Professional
Indemnity Insurance taken out.
·
The
architecture firm must also ensure that the any sub-contractors have adequate
PII cover which should be included in their appointment contracts.
Example: The level of PII cover that the Architecture
firm holds may be relevant to the Cancer Treatment Center. If the firm has been struggling over recent
years due to the recession, recent
commissions may have been relatively small in scale compared to the potential
Cancer Treatment Center commission. If
this is the case, the firm must ensure that there insurer is aware of the
larger value (or more complex) work about to be undertaken and check that the
level of indemnity in the terms of their appointment matches the level of
Indemnity Insurance taken out to avoid potential non cover in the unlikely
event of action taken under negligence.
Collateral Warrenties
·
Due
to privity of contract, only parties to a contract are bound by its terms. This means that the terms of the contract can
not generally be enforced by or against someone who is not party to it.
Construction projects often require a network of Collateral Warrenties to be
put in place, which extend terms set out in a contract to third parties who
have a vested interest in successful execution of the contract.
·
A
Collateral Warrenty is affectively a separate contract between the relevant
member of the project team and an third party (for example 3rd party
funder) including them the same rights to make claims under the contract.
·
In
architectural appointments, Architects should avoid collateral warranties where
possible and if required should never agree to greater liability under the
collateral warranty than in their appointment in scope, quantum or duration.
·
Similar
to the effects of a Collateral Warrenty, another way that the terms of a
contract can be passed on to a third party not privy to the original contract
is through a specific term written into the contract which has been allowed
through the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. This Act allows for the naming of a group or
specified third parties which the terms of the agreement are extended to.
However, this act has to be included into the contract terms and is not a
universal right. Many contracts exclude
the Act, for example the RIBA Standard Conditions of Appointment (clause 7.8)
·
A
typical example would be where an architect of a new office development owes a
duty of care to an occupier of the development in so far as any subsequent
defects which may arise are concerned. Privity of contract rules would prevent
any liability arising between the architect and occupier without the existence
of a collateral warranty.
Net Contribution
Clause
·
It
is not unusual in construction for more that one party to be responsible for a
issue causing a breach to the contract.
Under common law, both parties that have breached the contract are
jointly and severally liable for the loss or damage that flows from this
breach. This means that the claimant can
pursue the parties at fault either jointly or individually for damages, meaning
that each party at fault will be liable to pay full damages if the claimant
choses to pursue just one of the parties in breach. That party would then need to take out
further legal action to gain back the proportion of damage from the other
party.
·
The
amount that can be recovered from one party can be limited by a net
contribution clause. This restricts liability to the amount for which the party
being pursued is responsible. Other amounts must be recovered from the other
parties. Net contribution clauses assume that parties responsible for the same
loss or damage are all contractually liable to the other party to the contract,
and that they have paid the share that they would have been apportioned under
common law.
Section 106
Agreements
·
Section
106 of the Town and Country Planning Act
·
Planning
obligations (also known as Section 106 Agreements or 'planning gain') are
obligations attached to land that is the subject of a planning permission.
·
Used
to mitigate or compensate for the negative impacts of a development or to
prescribe the nature of a development.
·
Make
acceptable developments which would otherwise be unacceptable. Because they
apply to the land not the applicant, planning obligations transfer with the
land to future owners of the site.
·
Example As the project is significant,
and the local council has already indicated that they may have some
requirements for additional public open space, it is likely that a Section 106
Agreement (TCPA 1990) will also be required.
This will involve considerable negotiation over the social betterment
provisions that the local authority will require as a result of approving the
proposal and the Community Infrastructure Levy will also be relevant
Building Regulations
+ Control
·
Under
the Building Act 1984, building control has been delegated as a function to the
local authorities, through either building controlled officers or approved
inspectors.
·
They
are delegated to make sure buildings which fall under the Act are in line with
this legislation and the Building Regulations 2010.
·
The
building Regulations 2010 is a form of Building Approval Legislation. The
documents exist to secure the safety, sustainability and durability of
design. They also check the suitability
of building methods and materials used.
·
EXAMPLE: When planning the internal
layout of the large new-build office building, it was important that fire
safety should be considered to coincide with Part B of the Building Regs
2010. Part B1 says that the building
shall be designed and constructed so that there are appropriate provisions for
the early warning of fires and appropriate means of escape from the building to
a place of safety.
Novation
·
A
novation is a three-way agreement made by the original employer, an incoming
employer and the architect (or other service provided) under which the
architect appointment is transferred from the original employer to the new
employer so that after the novation the architect carries out their duties for
the benefit of the new employment and is paid by the new employer. This is usually undertaken through a deed of
novation.
·
Example: This is relevant to the
Cancer Treatment Center appointment, especially if the client chooses a Design
and Build procurement route. If the
architect is aware that this procurement route is favourable to the client,
they should ensure that the terms of the novation are discussed and agreed to
at the outset, and what the terms of any on-going agreement to provide service
to the client will be. There are two
types of novation – a basic switch from client to contractor and a “ab initio”
where the new employer is deemed to have been the architect client from the
outset. The second type of novation
should be avoided. If there is a
significant risk that the party to whom the architect will be novated does not
have a sufficiently strong financial covenant to pay the architects fees then
the architect should not go through with the novation.
Letter of Intent
·
A
letter of intent covers a broad range of agreements between parties, with
varying degrees of formality.
·
Although
often considered a mechanism for getting the ball rolling by outlining the
initial works and key terms (for example, perhaps fee and timing), a letter of
intent typically lacks the weighting of a properly settled contract with agreed
appointment terms.
·
Depending
on the content of the letter of intent it is difficult to know in advance what
interpretation a court would give to such a document if a dispute based solely
on a letter of intent was to arise.
·
Therefore,
the primary disadvantage over a formal appointment contract is their
unpredictability and if used when time is of the issue, should always be
followed up with a formal appointment contract.
·
ARB
Code of Conduct Standard 4 – Competent management of your business, address the
need for a formal services agreement.
·
RIBA
Code of Professional conduct Guidance note 4 addresses the importance of formal
agreement.
·
EXAMPLE: may be that a client is
desperate for the architect to preform a feasibility study on a site which is
going to auction in a weeks time. In
this case, due to time restraints, a letter of intent might be sent to the client
to outline the fee structure and the time structure for the first stage of the
works with a view to agree a formal architectural appointment at a later
date. This is in the understanding that
the urgency to start the feasibility study outweighs the risk of losing the job
and project to both client and architect
Building notice
·
On small projects, or when changes are made to an
existing building, approval may be sought by giving a 'building notice'. In
this case, a building inspector will approve the works as they are carried out
by a process of inspection.
·
A building notice application can be made with a
simple application form, a site plan (if an extension is involved) and the
appropriate fee (calculations may also be required for certain aspects
depending on the complexity of the project). This means that work can begin
very quickly, and need not necessarily involve design consultants.
·
However, a building notice application leaves the
client at risk that completed works might not be approved, resulting in
remedial costs.
Full plans submission
·
Generally on larger, new-build projects, a 'full
plans' application will be made, meaning that full details of the proposed
building works are submitted for approval before the works are carried out.
·
Full plans approvals are also subject to inspection
during the course of the works, but as long as the work is carried out in
accordance with the approved design, the risk of problems is very much lower
than for a building notice application.
Bespoke Agreements
Issues:
·
Choice
to use them is matter of professional principle, commercial judgement and
negotiating skills
·
Need
to obtain legal advice and consult PII broker, which costs time and money
·
Need
to check terms that we are signing up for a duty of care, not fitness for
purpose
·
Need
to check terms for collateral warranties
·
Payment
provisions
·
Copy
right
·
Termination
·
Disputes
·
Contraction
Act should apply as long as it is not a consumer client.
The legal
characteristics of a contract.
Agreement – Offer and Acceptance
Intention – that it will be binding
Consideration – Each party gets something from the
promise.
·
A
contract is a promise, or a set of promises which the law will enforce. The terms or the contract are only
enforceable to the parties privy to that contract. The first essential element of a contract is
the presents of an agreement (offer
and acceptance). There must be an offer
by one party and an acceptance of that offer by the other party. There also needs to be an intention that the agreement shall have
legal consequences. Finally, there needs
to be some form of Consideration. This means that each party must give
something, or a promise to give something, in return for the other’s act of
promise.
·
Although
the offer could be made Orally, written or by contract, both the RIBA and ARB
code of conduct require architect appointment to be in writing to make clear
the terms mitigating risk for disputes.
·
Example:
In relation to the student hub, the architect have a formal appointment
contract in place before design work progresses. The architect should promote the use of the
RIBA Standard Form of Contract for this, however, as the client is experienced
in the building industry but not necessary in the UK, they could expect push
for the client the use of their own bespoke contract. Regardless of the terms, within the agreement
should include the offer and acceptance of architectural works, an intention that the agreement shall have
legal consequences, and consideration ie. Outline the fee that the client will
pay in return for the architectural services.
No comments:
Post a Comment